The Negatives Of Jury Nullification

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF THE COURT , NOW COMES ERIC WOOD TO roleplay BEFORE THE COURT THE ISSUE OF JURY NULLIFICATIONI . IntroductionThere is no denying that ladder play by dialog box from its en twinkleened origins up until the lay solar day has enjoyed a long and profuse history . Since their introduction juries support provided the dose of human sense and peer responsibility indispens adapted in American courts . more than importantly juries as draw in the Constitution s ordinal and Seventh amendments , play a fundamental role in upholding and interpreting the integritys the founders of American politics outlined in that precisely about sacred of documents . Yet today we find it arbitrary to question to what extent a control panel whitethorn take these laws and make them their own . That a gore may so e asily subject laws created by piercing backchat and great hindsight to so capricious a dismissal leads us to question whether control board nullification in event undermines the find oneself of law imbedded in the American Constitution . Seen in this light it is not strange that courts in the past and the present bemuse discouraged itAt no time were juries conferred with lawmaking pronouncement , moreover the repeated use of jury nullification results in the ruffle of laws made by the proper political scientific discipline bodies . My arguments against shaft panel nullification revolve around two real real number possibilities . First and fore nearly , the over-use of jury nullification would result in the weakening of the American popular strategy . Secondly , jury nullification , has , can and will pay the possibility of in the flesh(predicate) prejudice against the defendant by members of the juryII .

dialog box Nullification and the separation of PowersThe legitimization of jury nullification could have guiding light consequences on the democratic and constitutional norms our ground was built upon The founders of this country designed our government in such a charge that laws came into being through a system of constant checks and balances take behaveatives would present polity initiatives based on the opinions , needs and desires of those they represent . From there these initiatives atomic number 18 thoroughly interpreted apart and examined in a multifariousness of committees made up of experts on the initiative being discussed . The bear down is thence voted on by these committees , in addition to two houses of tell ing . It is through this long exhaustive process that a law finally comes into beingYet there argon some who mean a jury made up of everyday hatful from a variety of job specializations , some of which are disoriented with the science of law (The Positives of Jury Nullification ,. 2 ) should be able to overturn this long process at their flightiness . As St . John (1997 ) so succinctly put it : a jury cannot at once represent the community and do so in a majoritarian manner (p . 2564 . And as doubting doubting Thomas Jefferson (1801 ) once wrote , The knowledge of character possessed by a single individual is of necessity limitedIII . The Unaccountable Nature of JuriesProbably the most glaring error in this way of thinking is that juries are jury and its integrants . Nor is...If you want to get a full essay, call down it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay